Pierre Gasly’s podium finish at the Monaco Grand Prix has been revoked following the reinstatement of two five-second penalties for pit lane speeding. This decision came after an appeal by McLaren and Red Bull to the FIA International Court of Appeal, which overturned an earlier review that had removed the penalties.
Originally, Gasly crossed the line in third place, securing a notable result for Alpine. However, he was initially handed two separate five-second penalties for exceeding the pit lane speed limit during the race. Alpine successfully requested a Right of Review, which temporarily cleared Gasly of the penalties and reinstated his third-place finish. This outcome was later challenged by McLaren and Red Bull, who appealed to the FIA International Court of Appeal.
The Court ruled in favour of McLaren and Red Bull’s appeal, reinstating the penalties against Gasly. As a result, his official finishing position dropped from third to seventh. This reshuffling promoted Alpine’s Isack Hadjar to third place, McLaren’s Oscar Piastri to fourth, and Racing Bulls drivers Liam Lawson and Arvid Lindblad moved up to fifth and sixth respectively.
This ruling highlights ongoing scrutiny of the Formula 1® timing systems and judicial procedures, including the mechanisms for Right of Review and appeals. The FIA has emphasized its support for the independence and objectivity of race stewards while recognizing that the International Court of Appeal has broader access to legal counsel and evidence, which can influence final decisions.
The FIA continues to review and refine its processes to ensure fairness and clarity in race adjudications. This case underlines the complexity of enforcing regulations in Formula 1® and the role of the judicial system in resolving disputes that affect race results.
For Alpine, the adjustment means a significant change in the points distribution from Monaco, while McLaren, Red Bull, and Racing Bulls benefit from the revised classification. The decision also serves as a reminder of the strict enforcement of pit lane speed limits and the consequences of infractions, even after initial reviews.
The FIA’s statement and the Court’s verdict provide a clear example of how appeals can alter race outcomes post-event, reflecting the legal framework underpinning the sport’s governance. This development is a notable moment in the 2026 Formula 1® season, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the procedural avenues available to teams.